<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter v. Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thoughtprocessinteractive.com/blog/twitter-v-facebook/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thoughtprocessinteractive.com/blog/twitter-v-facebook</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 16:23:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtprocessinteractive.com/blog/twitter-v-facebook/comment-page-1#comment-11851</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtprocessinteractive.com/blog/?p=470#comment-11851</guid>
		<description>In-depth Twitter growth and usage stats from June, 2009 http://sysomos.com/insidetwitter/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In-depth Twitter growth and usage stats from June, 2009 <a href="http://sysomos.com/insidetwitter/" rel="nofollow">http://sysomos.com/insidetwitter/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtprocessinteractive.com/blog/twitter-v-facebook/comment-page-1#comment-11373</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtprocessinteractive.com/blog/?p=470#comment-11373</guid>
		<description>Some good points. There are plenty of articles that have been published over the last few years that argue the same thing for Facebook, and it&#039;s ability to cash in on it&#039;s massive member base. Remember, Yahoo projected sometime in 2006 that FB would generate $969M in revenue by 2010. Oh, and they offered Mark Zuckerberg a cool $1B for it, which he turned it down.
So in terms of who will be profitable first, a couple other noteworthy Twitter points:
1) Twitter has accomplished something in search that even Google has not -- The ability to search real time content. That is HUGE, especially in terms of news/media.
2) When the price is right, Twitter co-founders will  cash in, as they have done in the past. And that&#039;s pretty profitable. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some good points. There are plenty of articles that have been published over the last few years that argue the same thing for Facebook, and it&#8217;s ability to cash in on it&#8217;s massive member base. Remember, Yahoo projected sometime in 2006 that FB would generate $969M in revenue by 2010. Oh, and they offered Mark Zuckerberg a cool $1B for it, which he turned it down.<br />
So in terms of who will be profitable first, a couple other noteworthy Twitter points:<br />
1) Twitter has accomplished something in search that even Google has not &#8212; The ability to search real time content. That is HUGE, especially in terms of news/media.<br />
2) When the price is right, Twitter co-founders will  cash in, as they have done in the past. And that&#8217;s pretty profitable. <img src='http://www.thoughtprocessinteractive.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
