<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bing has Bling!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thoughtprocessinteractive.com/blog/bing-has-bling/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thoughtprocessinteractive.com/blog/bing-has-bling</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 03:52:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtprocessinteractive.com/blog/bing-has-bling/comment-page-1#comment-9880</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtprocessinteractive.com/blog/?p=433#comment-9880</guid>
		<description>I really like the way you can navigate to multiple pages within a site all under one search result listing. For example, if you &quot;bing&quot; something like &quot;Scottrade&quot;, the top organic listing has links to Branch Locator, Signup, Stocks, Mutual Funds, About...etc.

This way I don&#039;t have to sift through multiple search results if I&#039;m looking for one of those pages specifically.

http://www.bing.com/search?q=scottrade&amp;go=&amp;form=QBRE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the way you can navigate to multiple pages within a site all under one search result listing. For example, if you &#8220;bing&#8221; something like &#8220;Scottrade&#8221;, the top organic listing has links to Branch Locator, Signup, Stocks, Mutual Funds, About&#8230;etc.</p>
<p>This way I don&#8217;t have to sift through multiple search results if I&#8217;m looking for one of those pages specifically.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=scottrade&#038;go=&#038;form=QBRE" rel="nofollow">http://www.bing.com/search?q=scottrade&#038;go=&#038;form=QBRE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtprocessinteractive.com/blog/bing-has-bling/comment-page-1#comment-9601</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtprocessinteractive.com/blog/?p=433#comment-9601</guid>
		<description>Not sure where the name originated...but it looks to be live now:

http://www.bing.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure where the name originated&#8230;but it looks to be live now:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bing.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bing.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelsey</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtprocessinteractive.com/blog/bing-has-bling/comment-page-1#comment-9600</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtprocessinteractive.com/blog/?p=433#comment-9600</guid>
		<description>Any thoughts on the name? I read somewhere that they chose it because it represents sort of an &quot;aha!&quot; moment (light bulbs turning on and such). All I can think of is Chandler :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any thoughts on the name? I read somewhere that they chose it because it represents sort of an &#8220;aha!&#8221; moment (light bulbs turning on and such). All I can think of is Chandler <img src='http://www.thoughtprocessinteractive.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtprocessinteractive.com/blog/bing-has-bling/comment-page-1#comment-9530</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtprocessinteractive.com/blog/?p=433#comment-9530</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a good thing that Google will have a legit (if only for a week) competitor in search. While Google has made great strides in other areas with Google Labs it seems as though they&#039;ve gotten complacent with search. &quot;If it ain&#039;t broke, don&#039;t fix it&quot; mentality kills innovation.

Unfortunately, from what I can tell Bing is just Live with a new design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a good thing that Google will have a legit (if only for a week) competitor in search. While Google has made great strides in other areas with Google Labs it seems as though they&#8217;ve gotten complacent with search. &#8220;If it ain&#8217;t broke, don&#8217;t fix it&#8221; mentality kills innovation.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, from what I can tell Bing is just Live with a new design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

